Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Small Causes Court could grant an ad interim injunction restraining the parties from prosecuting proceedings before the Officer on Special Duty under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
Analysis: Proceedings before the Officer on Special Duty under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 were treated as judicial proceedings before a court in the eye of law. Under section 41(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, an injunction cannot be granted to restrain prosecution of proceedings in a court not subordinate to the court from which injunction is sought. Since the Officer on Special Duty was not subordinate to the Small Causes Court, the grant of ad interim injunction was inconsistent with the statutory bar and the prior decision of the Court on the same jurisdictional issue.
Conclusion: The ad interim injunction was without jurisdiction and had to be set aside.