https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277557 Proceedings before the Officer on Special Duty under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 were treated as judicial proceedings before a court in law, so an injunction could not be used to restrain their prosecution where the forum sought to be restrained was not subordinate to the court issuing the injunction. Applying section 41(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the Small Causes Court lacked jurisdiction to grant an ad interim injunction against those proceedings. The injunction was therefore inconsistent with the statutory bar and was set aside. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:44:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277557 Proceedings before the Officer on Special Duty under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 were treated as judicial proceedings before a court in law, so an injunction could not be used to restrain their prosecution where the forum sought to be restrained was not subordinate to the court issuing the injunction. Applying section 41(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the Small Causes Court lacked jurisdiction to grant an ad interim injunction against those proceedings. The injunction was therefore inconsistent with the statutory bar and was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277557