Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1972 (11) TMI 102 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Municipal property tax valuation follows rent-control limits: standard rent caps assessment when fixed, otherwise agreed rent may govern. For municipal property tax, annual value or rateable value is governed by the rent the premises may reasonably be expected to fetch, but that standard is ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Municipal property tax valuation follows rent-control limits: standard rent caps assessment when fixed, otherwise agreed rent may govern.

                            For municipal property tax, annual value or rateable value is governed by the rent the premises may reasonably be expected to fetch, but that standard is controlled by rent law. Where standard rent has been fixed or is statutorily determined, assessment cannot exceed that ceiling because higher rent is not legally recoverable. Where no standard rent has been fixed, the legally recoverable agreed rent for let premises may be used, unless its genuineness is affected by factors such as fraud or collusion. For premises never let or first assessed, annual value must still be determined on the applicable statutory rent-control basis.




                            Issues: (i) Whether, for property tax purposes, the municipal authority is bound to cap annual value or rateable value by standard rent where standard rent has been fixed or is statutorily determined under the rent law. (ii) Whether, where standard rent has not been fixed or statutorily determined, the municipal authority may assess annual value on the basis of the actual agreed rent in the case of let premises. (iii) What basis governs fixation of annual value for premises never let or first assessed for the first time.

                            Issue (i): Whether, for property tax purposes, the municipal authority is bound to cap annual value or rateable value by standard rent where standard rent has been fixed or is statutorily determined under the rent law.

                            Analysis: The relevant municipal provisions fix annual value or rateable value by reference to the rent at which the premises might reasonably be expected to let. That expression must be read in the light of the rent control legislation in force. Where standard rent has been fixed by the Controller or is otherwise statutorily determined, rent above that limit is not legally recoverable and cannot be treated as reasonable letting value. The ceiling operates because a landlord cannot reasonably be expected to let at a rent prohibited by law.

                            Conclusion: Yes. The municipal assessment cannot exceed the standard rent where such rent has been fixed or statutorily determined.

                            Issue (ii): Whether, where standard rent has not been fixed or statutorily determined, the municipal authority may assess annual value on the basis of the actual agreed rent in the case of let premises.

                            Analysis: The Delhi Rent Control Act permits recovery of contractual rent until standard rent is fixed. In such a situation, the agreed rent is legally recoverable and represents the rent the premises may reasonably be expected to fetch from a tenant. The statutory ceiling based on standard rent does not arise until standard rent is fixed or is otherwise deemed fixed by the statute. Accordingly, for let premises where no such fixation or statutory determination exists, actual agreed rent is a proper basis, save where the rent is tainted by fraud, collusion, emergency, relationship or similar factors affecting genuineness.

                            Conclusion: Yes. In the absence of fixation or statutory determination of standard rent, the municipal authority may proceed on the basis of the agreed rent if it is legally recoverable.

                            Issue (iii): What basis governs fixation of annual value for premises never let or first assessed for the first time.

                            Analysis: For premises not let, never let, or first brought to assessment, the annual value must still be determined by reference to the rent-control standards. Where the premises fall within categories for which the statute itself prescribes standard rent, that statutory basis applies; failing that, the Controller would proceed on the reasonable cost of construction and market value of land, or on the principles for reasonable rent in the rent-control statute.

                            Conclusion: The annual value for such premises must be determined on the statutory rent-control basis applicable to the premises.

                            Final Conclusion: The municipal authorities were entitled to assess the premises on the basis of agreed rent in cases where standard rent had neither been fixed nor statutorily determined, and the contrary view of the single judge was rejected on the principal issue.

                            Ratio Decidendi: For municipal taxation, the phrase denoting rent at which premises may reasonably be expected to let is controlled by the rent law: standard rent forms an absolute ceiling only when it has been fixed or statutorily determined, while legally recoverable agreed rent may be used where no such fixation exists.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found