Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a municipal rule fixing a rate on open lands at a percentage of capital value was valid under sections 73 and 75 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925.
Analysis: The statutory expression "rate" in section 73 was construed in light of its settled legislative history in England and India as a tax on the annual value of lands and buildings, not on capital value directly. The explanation to section 75, permitting capital value as a basis of valuation for lands, was held to refer only to a recognised method of arriving at annual value and not to authorise the levy itself as a percentage of capital value. A direct levy on capital value was treated as altering the true incidence of the tax and as going beyond the authority conferred by the Act.
Conclusion: The impugned rule was ultra vires sections 73 and 75 of the Act, and the assessment made under it was invalid.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the municipal levy on open lands, insofar as it was based directly on capital value, was struck down.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute authorises a municipal "rate" on lands, the levy must be imposed on annual value unless the statute expressly permits taxation directly on capital value; a valuation basis cannot be converted into the taxable measure itself by rule.