Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of assessment of income from house property under section 22, the annual value of the assessee's house was to be determined on the basis of the actual rent received or with reference to the standard rent determinable under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Analysis: The question had already been settled by the Supreme Court's earlier decision that, even where standard rent had not been fixed by the Controller and the limitation period for seeking fixation had expired, the annual value of a controlled property is governed by the standard rent determinable under the rent control law and not by the actual rent received. The High Court's refusal to call for a reference was therefore erroneous, and the question of law was answered consistently with that settled principle.
Conclusion: The annual value had to be taken as the standard rent determinable under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and not the actual rent received; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.