Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand notice requiring immediate payment of the sales tax deferment amount for the relevant year could be sustained when the eligibility certificate provided for repayment only at the end of the financial year.
Analysis: The repayment obligation under the Final Eligibility Certificate was binding on both the assessee and the tax department. The certificate required repayment of the deferred sales tax amount at the end of the 14th year without interest, and the governing expression was repayment at the end of the year, not during the year. The fact that part-payment had been made earlier by the assessee did not authorise the department to insist upon full recovery before the stipulated year-end. Coercive recovery could therefore be initiated only after the repayment period expired.
Conclusion: The demand notice was unsustainable and was set aside; the assessee was entitled to time till the end of the financial year to make payment, and recovery could be taken only thereafter if payment was not made.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax deferment certificate prescribes repayment at the end of a specified period or year, the revenue cannot accelerate recovery before that stipulated date merely because part-payment has been made earlier.