Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a suit seeking permanent injunction against the Government or a public authority could proceed without notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and whether a plea of supposed or presumed waiver was sufficient to avoid the statutory requirement.
Analysis: Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is mandatory and admits of no implied exceptions. In a suit for injunction also, prior notice is required unless there is an actual waiver in fact. A mere assertion that notice should be deemed waived, or that giving notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, does not amount to proof of waiver. The plea in the plaint disclosed only a presumed waiver and not an actual waiver. The plaint was therefore liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Conclusion: The statutory notice requirement was not dispensed with, and the plaint was rightly rejected.