Tribunal Prevents Double Taxation, Grants Relief to Appellants

The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that taxing them for service tax on revenue share for services jointly provided with another company would result in double taxation of the same service. The tribunal considered previous decisions and waived the pre-deposit requirement, ultimately allowing the stay applications and appeals, providing relief to the appellants.

---

---

Issues:
Demand of service tax on revenue share for services jointly provided with another company.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a case where the impugned order confirmed a demand for service tax on the share of revenue paid to the appellant for services provided jointly with another company. The demand was confirmed on the grounds that the appellant was providing Business Auxiliary Services to the other company. However, the appellant argued that they had entered into an agreement to conduct commodity futures broking activities exclusively using the facilities provided by the other company, which was already discharging service tax under a different category. The appellant contended that taxing them would amount to double taxation of the same service. The appellant relied on previous decisions, including one by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala and another by the Larger Bench, which established that the same service cannot be taxed twice. The tribunal found the appellant's submissions valid and agreed with them.

The tribunal, after considering the arguments and the precedents cited, decided to take up the appeal itself for a final decision, waiving the requirement of pre-deposit. Ultimately, the tribunal allowed the stay applications and the appeals, providing consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment was pronounced in open court, bringing the matter to a close.

---