Product classification dispute over insecticide status required fresh consideration of registration evidence and statutory certificate effect.

Classification of the product 'Vipul Booster' depended on whether it was an insecticide or a plant growth regulator, and the Tribunal was found to have overlooked material evidence relevant to that question. The product had been registered as an insecticide with the Directorate of Plant Protection, and compliance with the Insecticide Act, 1968, including the certificate issued under that Act, required examination. The competing claim that the certificate related only to one ingredient also called for factual and legal reconsideration. The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the product 'Vipul Booster' was to be treated as an insecticide or as a plant growth regulator, and whether the Tribunal had failed to consider material evidence bearing on that classification.

Analysis: The product had been registered as an insecticide with the Directorate of Plant Protection and the procedures under the Insecticide Act, 1968 had been followed. That aspect, along with the effect of the certificate issued under that Act, had not been examined by the Tribunal. The competing contention that the certificate related only to one ingredient required factual and legal reconsideration.

Outcome: The impugned judgment was set aside and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

---