Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court denies review of order, citing prior decision on merits and lack of review authority.</h1> The bench rejected the appellant's miscellaneous application for review of an order, stating that the appeal had already been decided on merits and they ... Review petition - Appeal decided ex parte - Held that:- It is observed from the case records that Order No. A/12268/2014 dated 12-12-2014 was passed by the bench on merits after rejecting the adjournment request of the appellant as the same was not convincing. On merits once the appeal has been rejected then this bench has no power to review its own order. - Decided against assessee. The appellant filed a miscellaneous application for review of an order passed by the bench against them on merit. The bench rejected the application as the appeal had already been decided on merits and they had no power to review it. The miscellaneous application was rejected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
