CESTAT Mumbai Upholds Section 80 Benefit for Manpower Provision The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting the respondent the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Mumbai Upholds Section 80 Benefit for Manpower Provision
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting the respondent the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal determined that the respondent's provision of manpower for harvesting and supplying sugar did not fall within the relevant sections, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order extending the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 to the respondent. The Tribunal found that the respondent's activity of supplying manpower for harvesting and supplying sugar was not covered under relevant sections, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Revenue.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.