1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>130-day Delay Condoned in Appeal Refiling: Commissioner, Central Excise v. M/s. K.C. Alloys</h1> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana condoned a 130-day delay in refiling the appeal in the case of Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana ... Condonation of delay - Delay of 130 days - High condoned the delay in the appeal. The detailed order of case are given in Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana v. M/s. K.C. Alloys & Steel Castings, Ludhiana [2014 (5) TMI 300 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT]. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana condoned a delay of 130 days in refiling the appeal. The citation is 2015 (10) TMI 642. Judges were Ajay Kumar Mittal and Jaspal Singh. The case is related to Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana v. M/s. K.C. Alloys & Steel Castings, Ludhiana (CEA No. 77 of 2005).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
