Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (9) TMI 954 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs reassessment of transfer pricing adjustments & section 10A claim, stresses correct allocation & comparables exclusion. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute transfer pricing adjustments and the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal directs reassessment of transfer pricing adjustments & section 10A claim, stresses correct allocation & comparables exclusion.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute transfer pricing adjustments and the allowance of the claim under section 10A. This was to be done after considering the correct allocation of Head Office expenses and excluding inappropriate comparables. Additionally, the AO/TPO was instructed to comply with the DRP's directions on the refund calculation.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Admission of additional grounds.
                            2. Transfer pricing adjustment based on incorrect profit and loss account segmentation.
                            3. Re-computation of the allowance of claim under section 10A.
                            4. Transfer pricing adjustments for software development services segment.
                            5. Transfer pricing adjustments for ITES segment.
                            6. Compliance with DRP directions on refund calculation.
                            7. Interest under section 234B.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Admission of Additional Grounds:
                            The Tribunal considered the assessee's request to admit additional grounds which were crucial to the matter. The additional grounds pertained to the incorrect profit and loss account segmentation and the re-computation of the allowance of the claim under section 10A. The Tribunal admitted these grounds as they were consequential and went to the root of the matter, potentially causing irreparable damage if not considered.

                            2. Transfer Pricing Adjustment Based on Incorrect Profit and Loss Account Segmentation:
                            The assessee argued that the transfer pricing adjustment calculated by the TPO was based on an incorrect profit and loss account segmentation, discovered during the assessment proceedings for AY 2008-09. This error was due to the non-allocation of Head Office expenses to the packaging segment. The Tribunal found that similar issues had been addressed in the assessee's own case for AY 2009-10, where the matter was referred back to the TPO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to reconsider the allocation of costs and re-compute the transfer pricing adjustments accordingly.

                            3. Re-computation of the Allowance of Claim Under Section 10A:
                            The Tribunal noted that the re-computation of the allowance of the claim under section 10A was consequential to the correction of the profit and loss account segmentation. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the allowance of the claim under section 10A after considering the revised segmental margins.

                            4. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for Software Development Services Segment:
                            The assessee contended that if the Head Office expenses were correctly allocated, no adjustment would be necessary for the software development services segment. The Revenue agreed that the matter required a fresh look. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to re-analyze the software development services segment, considering the correct allocation of Head Office expenses.

                            5. Transfer Pricing Adjustments for ITES Segment:
                            The assessee argued that the comparables considered by the TPO for the ITES segment were inappropriate. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that certain comparables, such as Eclerx Services Ltd, Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd (Seg), and Vishal Information Technologies Ltd, should be excluded based on previous Tribunal decisions and the nature of their operations. The Tribunal directed the TPO to exclude these comparables and re-compute the transfer pricing adjustments for the ITES segment after allocating the Head Office expenses correctly.

                            6. Compliance with DRP Directions on Refund Calculation:
                            The assessee claimed that the AO/TPO did not comply with the DRP's directions regarding the refund calculation. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to verify the assessee's claim and modify the calculation of interest under section 234D accordingly.

                            7. Interest Under Section 234B:
                            The Tribunal noted that the issue of interest under section 234B was consequential and did not require specific adjudication.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the transfer pricing adjustments and the allowance of the claim under section 10A after considering the correct allocation of Head Office expenses and excluding inappropriate comparables. The Tribunal also directed the AO/TPO to comply with the DRP's directions regarding the refund calculation.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found