Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when the proposed addition was not indicated in the show-cause notice and the assessee was denied personal hearing.
Analysis: The assessment was founded on an addition that had not been specifically proposed in the notice issued to the assessee. The assessee also complained of non-grant of personal hearing before the order was passed. In these circumstances, the assessment was found to be vitiated for want of proper opportunity and for breach of natural justice. The availability of an alternative statutory appeal did not prevent interference, especially when the limitation for appeal had already expired and the matter required reconsideration on a proper hearing.
Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed, the assessment order was quashed, and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.