Binding precedent foreclosed interference with the writ dismissal, leaving the appeal without merit.

The Supreme Court found the appeal squarely covered by its earlier decisions on the appellant's claim and therefore held that the High Court had correctly dismissed the writ petition. As the binding precedent fully governed the issue, no error or ground for interference was made out. The appeal was held to be without merit and was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal called for interference with the dismissal of the writ petition, in view of binding precedent on the appellant's claim.

Analysis: The appeal was held to be squarely covered by earlier decisions of the Supreme Court. In that view, the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition was found to be correct and no error was found warranting interference.

Conclusion: The appeal was held to be without merit and was dismissed.

---