Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (8) TMI 169 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Co-op bank must deduct TDS on interest payments over Rs.10,000 to members The tribunal upheld the decision that the co-operative bank, as the assessee, was liable to deduct TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 to its ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Co-op bank must deduct TDS on interest payments over Rs.10,000 to members

                          The tribunal upheld the decision that the co-operative bank, as the assessee, was liable to deduct TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 to its members under Section 194A(3)(i)(b) of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal dismissed the appeals for both assessment years, emphasizing that the CBDT circular could not override the statutory provision and that inconsistent judgments were not binding due to their per incuriam nature.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Liability of the assessee to deduct TDS on interest payments to its members.
                          2. Applicability of Section 194A(3)(v) and Section 194A(3)(i)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          3. Validity of the demand created by the ITO (TDS) under Section 201 and 201(1A) for short deduction of TDS.
                          4. Relevance and binding nature of CBDT Circular No. 9/2002.
                          5. Consistency in the application of tax laws and previous judgments.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Liability of the Assessee to Deduct TDS on Interest Payments to its Members:
                          The primary issue before the tribunal was whether the assessee, a co-operative bank, was required to deduct TDS on interest payments made to its members. The assessee argued that under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act, it was exempt from deducting TDS on such payments. The ITO (TDS) and the CIT(A) held that the assessee was liable to deduct TDS, resulting in a demand for short deduction and interest.

                          2. Applicability of Section 194A(3)(v) and Section 194A(3)(i)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                          The tribunal examined the provisions of Section 194A(3)(v), which exempts co-operative societies from deducting TDS on interest paid to their members. However, it also considered Section 194A(3)(i)(b), which specifically applies to co-operative societies engaged in banking and provides an exemption only up to Rs. 10,000. The tribunal concluded that Section 194A(3)(i)(b) is a special provision applicable to co-operative banks, and therefore, the general provision under Section 194A(3)(v) does not absolve the assessee from deducting TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000.

                          3. Validity of the Demand Created by the ITO (TDS) under Section 201 and 201(1A) for Short Deduction of TDS:
                          The ITO (TDS) created a demand of Rs. 49,01,840 for the assessment year 2012-13 and Rs. 48,08,420 for the assessment year 2013-14, citing short deduction of TDS and interest under Section 201 and 201(1A). The tribunal upheld this demand, stating that the assessee was indeed required to deduct TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 as per Section 194A(3)(i)(b).

                          4. Relevance and Binding Nature of CBDT Circular No. 9/2002:
                          The assessee relied heavily on CBDT Circular No. 9/2002, which clarified that members of a co-operative bank could receive interest without TDS under Section 194A(3)(v). However, the tribunal held that CBDT circulars cannot override statutory provisions. Since the specific provision for co-operative banks under Section 194A(3)(i)(b) mandates TDS for interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000, the circular could not be used to negate this requirement.

                          5. Consistency in the Application of Tax Laws and Previous Judgments:
                          The tribunal acknowledged the principle of consistency in tax laws but noted that previous judgments, such as the one in the case of Kashipur Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., were rendered per incuriam (in ignorance of the relevant statutory provision) and thus could not be considered binding precedents. The tribunal emphasized that the specific statutory provision applicable to co-operative banks must be followed.

                          Conclusion:
                          The tribunal dismissed the appeals for both assessment years, upholding the orders of the CIT(A) and the ITO (TDS). It confirmed that the assessee, being a co-operative bank, was required to deduct TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 to its members as per Section 194A(3)(i)(b) and that the CBDT circular could not override this statutory requirement. The tribunal also clarified that previous inconsistent judgments were not binding due to their per incuriam nature.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found