TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed for duty refunds on liquid cargo imports clarifying Circulars.</h1> <h3>M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva</h3> M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd Versus Commissioner of Customs (Import), Nhava Sheva - TMI Issues:- Appeal against rejection of refunds by Commissioner (Appeals) for duty paid on liquid cargo import.- Interpretation of Board Circulars 96/2002 and 6/2006 regarding assessment of duty based on shore tank quantity or invoice price.- Application of Circulars in cases of duty assessed on ad valorem basis or specific rate basis.- Retrospective application of Circulars.- Legal examination of Customs Act provisions regarding duty assessment and tariff values.- Relevance of quantity received in shore tanks for duty calculation.- Comparison of transaction value and tariff value for duty assessment.- Taxable event for import of goods under Customs Act.- Precedents set by Tribunal and Supreme Court judgments in similar cases.Analysis:The judgment pertains to appeals challenging the rejection of refunds by the adjudicating authority for duty paid on liquid cargo import. The appellant, M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd., claimed refunds based on discrepancies between the shore tank quantity received and the Bill of Lading quantity, contending that duty was overpaid. The dispute revolved around the application of Board Circulars 96/2002 and 6/2006. The appellant argued that Circular 6/2006, amending the assessment basis, was ultra vires and should not apply retroactively to their assessments made earlier. They relied on legal precedents and Commissioner's views to support their position.The Tribunal analyzed the Customs Act provisions, specifically Sections 12, 14(1), and 14(2), to determine the appropriate basis for duty assessment. It emphasized the importance of the quantity received in shore tanks for duty calculation, citing the NOCIL case and subsequent Board Circulars. The judgment clarified that the assessment should align with the Customs Act provisions and relevant Circulars, distinguishing between duty assessed on ad valorem and specific rate basis.Regarding the retrospective application of Circulars, the Tribunal ruled that the issue at hand must be decided based on existing law, irrespective of the Circular's timing. It highlighted the distinction between transaction value and tariff value under the Customs Act, emphasizing the relevance of the actual quantity imported for duty calculation. The judgment also discussed the taxable event for import of goods and upheld the legal precedents set by the Supreme Court and Tribunal in similar cases, affirming that duty should be charged based on the quantity received in shore tanks.Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief in accordance with the law. The judgment, pronounced on 9.2.2015, provides a detailed legal analysis of the issues involved, emphasizing the correct interpretation of Customs Act provisions and relevant Circulars in duty assessment cases involving liquid cargo imports.
TaxTMI 