Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packaging Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 applied so as to justify treating one packing machine as two machines and demanding double duty where the products carried different retail sale prices but fell within the same slab, and whether pre-deposit and recovery deserved to be stayed.
Analysis: The demand was noticed as being prima facie barred by limitation. On merits, the order followed the Tribunal's earlier view that Rule 8 operates only where the pan masala products fall under different slabs. Where both retail sale prices fall within the same slab, the machine is to be treated as one packing machine only, and the rationale for double duty does not arise.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.