Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2015 (3) TMI 1033 - HC - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act. Addressed concerns, compliance assured. Property transfer directed. The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The concerns raised by the Regional ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court Sanctions Amalgamation Scheme under Companies Act. Addressed concerns, compliance assured. Property transfer directed.

                            The court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The concerns raised by the Regional Director regarding the valuation of shares and share exchange ratio were addressed by the Petitioner Companies. The Transferee Company provided an affidavit undertaking to comply with RBI Guidelines. Approval from shareholders and creditors, along with reports from the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, supported the grant of sanction. The judgment directed the transfer of property, rights, and powers from the Transferor Company to the Transferee Company, leading to the dissolution of the Transferor Company. Compliance with statutory requirements was mandated.




                            Issues:
                            1. Sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
                            2. Valuation of shares and share exchange ratio concerns raised by the Regional Director.
                            3. Compliance with RBI Guidelines by the Transferee Company.
                            4. Approval of the Scheme by shareholders and creditors.
                            5. Transfer of property, rights, and liabilities from Transferor Company to Transferee Company.

                            Analysis:
                            1. The judgment pertains to a second motion joint Petition filed seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies, LRSD Global Holdings Private Limited (Transferor Company) and Rajasthan Global Securities Limited (Transferee Company), have complied with all necessary requirements, including filing resolutions, memorandum, and articles of association, and obtaining dispensation of meetings of shareholders and creditors.

                            2. The Regional Director raised concerns regarding the valuation of shares and the share exchange ratio. The Regional Director highlighted discrepancies in the valuation of shares between the years 2012-13 and the present scheme. The Petitioner responded by explaining the valuation process, emphasizing the determination of a fair share exchange ratio for the merger rather than standalone valuation. The Petitioner also clarified the buyback of shares at different prices and how the proposed valuation was solely for determining the swap ratio.

                            3. Another concern raised was the requirement for the Transferee Company, being an NBFC, to comply with RBI Guidelines. The Transferee Company provided an affidavit undertaking to comply with all applicable RBI Guidelines, addressing the concern raised by the Regional Director.

                            4. The judgment noted that no objections were received from any other party regarding the Scheme of Amalgamation. The approval of shareholders and creditors, along with the reports filed by the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, supported the grant of sanction to the Scheme. The Petitioner Companies were directed to comply with statutory requirements.

                            5. The judgment directed the transfer of property, rights, and powers from the Transferor Company to the Transferee Company without further act or deed, leading to the dissolution of the Transferor Company. The order clarified that it did not exempt from payment of stamp duty or other charges and required compliance with all legal requirements. Additionally, the Petitioner Companies agreed to deposit a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.

                            In conclusion, the judgment granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation, addressing concerns raised by the Regional Director, ensuring compliance with RBI Guidelines, and confirming approval from relevant parties for the transfer of assets and liabilities between the companies.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found