Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants, being co-owners receiving rent separately, were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit on the ground that the value of taxable services attributable to each of them remained within the small scale exemption threshold.
Analysis: The exemption notification grants benefit based on the aggregate value of taxable services rendered, with the threshold tested for the assessee for the relevant year. On the facts, the rent was received by the co-owners separately and, if each appellant was considered as an individual service provider, the aggregate value attributable to each did not cross the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery was ordered to remain stayed till disposal of the appeals.