TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Dismissal of Excise Appeals for Significant Delays; Reasons Deemed Insufficient</h1> <h3>ANVIL CABLES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX. & ST., JAMSHEDPUR</h3> The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's Excise Appeals 434, 550, and 549 of 2009 due to significant delays of 273, 719, and 83 days ... Condonation of delay - Held that:- In the cases of appeals preferred by the petitioner, plea was taken that one Mr. Bittu left the company on 29th October, 2008, without informing that he received the copy of the order which is sought to be challenged by the petitioner. The Tribunal has considered the fact of each of the appeals and given cogent reasons for holding that the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for condonation of delay - Tribunal has rightly considered the facts and rightly reached to the conclusion that the cause shown by the petitioner appears to be only afterthought and there is no sufficient cause for condonation of delay - Condonation denied. The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's Excise Appeals 434, 550, and 549 of 2009 as they were filed after significant delays of 273, 719, and 83 days respectively. The court found that the reasons provided for the delays were insufficient and appeared to be an afterthought. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
