Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, after obtaining exemption under the Government Order dated 11 August 2000 and the order of the District Magistrate, was entitled to collect entertainment tax from cinema-goers and retain it as an incentive or grant-in-aid.
Analysis: The earlier Government Orders of 1994 and 1998 operated as grant-in-aid schemes meant to compensate cinema hall owners, whereas the Government Order dated 11 August 2000 introduced a different scheme of exemption under Section 11(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Entertainments and Betting Tax Act, 1979. The new scheme was framed for the benefit of cinema-goers and for expanding the tax base, not for allowing owners to appropriate tax collections. Section 3 of the Act remained the charging provision, under which entertainment tax collected from viewers had to be paid to the Government. The District Magistrate's order only required separate disclosure in Form B for statistical purposes and did not authorise retention of the tax amount.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to retain the entertainment tax collected from cinema-goers, and the demand for deposit of the amount was valid.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed because the exemption scheme did not create any right to keep the collected tax as personal benefit or grant-in-aid.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption from liability to pay entertainment tax does not authorise the proprietor to collect and retain the tax unless the governing order expressly creates such a right.