Tribunal grants stay extension for assessment year 2007-08 appeal, with conditions The Tribunal granted an extension of stay for the demand already stayed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2007-08 until the final disposal of the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal grants stay extension for assessment year 2007-08 appeal, with conditions
The Tribunal granted an extension of stay for the demand already stayed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2007-08 until the final disposal of the appeal, or for a further 180 days from the date of the order, whichever is earlier. The extension was subject to the condition that the assessee not seek adjournment without just cause, with unwarranted adjournments leading to automatic revocation of the stay. The stay application was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on May 30, 2014.
Issues: Extension of stay of demand for assessment year 2007-08
Analysis: The judgment pertains to a stay application seeking an extension of the demand already stayed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2007-08 until the final disposal of the appeal. The Tribunal had previously granted stays which were subsequently extended multiple times due to non-disposal of the appeal. The counsel for the assessee argued that the delay in hearing was not the fault of the assessee. Citing precedents like Tata Communications Ltd. vs ACIT and CIT vs. Ronuk Industries Ltd., it was held that the Tribunal has the power to extend the stay even beyond 365 days if the delay is not attributable to the assessee. Considering the factual position and the assessee's compliance with the terms of the initial stay, the Tribunal granted the extension of stay till the disposal of the appeal or for a further 180 days from the date of the order, whichever is earlier. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on a specific date.
The Tribunal imposed a condition that the extension of stay is subject to the assessee not seeking adjournment without just cause. Any unwarranted adjournment would lead to automatic revocation of the stay and the case being de-listed from priority, to be heard in the normal course. Ultimately, the stay application was allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on May 30, 2014.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.