Appellate Tribunal rules Safdarjung Club not liable for Mandap Keeper service. Stay application denied. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Safdarjung Club, ruling that it did not provide Mandap Keeper service due ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules Safdarjung Club not liable for Mandap Keeper service. Stay application denied.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Safdarjung Club, ruling that it did not provide Mandap Keeper service due to the lack of a client-employer relationship, following the precedent set in Karnavati Club Ltd. v. Union of India. The stay application was also denied.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal against Safdarjung Club, holding that it did not provide Mandap Keeper service. The decision was based on the absence of a client-employer relationship, as per the ruling in Karnavati Club Ltd. v. Union of India. The stay application was also dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.