CESTAT Mumbai Denies Adjournment, Boiler Ash Not Excisable The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI denied the adjournment request in a case concerning the classification of boiler ash as excisable goods or a ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Mumbai Denies Adjournment, Boiler Ash Not Excisable
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI denied the adjournment request in a case concerning the classification of boiler ash as excisable goods or a by-product. Following a Supreme Court precedent, it was determined that boiler ash does not qualify as excisable goods, resulting in the appeals being granted.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI declined the request for adjournment. The issue was whether boiler ash is excisable goods or a by-product. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, it was ruled that boiler ash is not excisable goods, and the appeals were allowed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.