Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the duty and penalty demanded.
Analysis: The goods were received under CT-3 for use in manufacture and were later returned to the original manufacturer under proper invoices and AR-3A. The record indicated that the goods had been accounted for and there was no diversion. On that basis, the appellant made out a prima facie case that the demand was covered by the Central Excise Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods Rules, 2001.
Conclusion: The application for waiver of pre-deposit was allowed and recovery was stayed till disposal of the appeal.