Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the highest bidder's failure to deposit twenty-five per cent of the bid immediately, the Collector was bound to direct a resale under section 167 of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901.
Analysis: Section 167 required immediate deposit of twenty-five per cent of the bid by the person declared purchaser, and on default the land was to be forthwith put up and sold again. The provision was treated as mandatory, leaving no discretion to ignore the default or to sustain the sale without ordering a resale. Since the bidder failed to make the required deposit, the authorities were bound to cancel the sale and direct re-auction. The Commissioner's order, which declined to sustain the resale direction on the ground of irregularity, ignored the mandatory consequence flowing from the statutory default.
Conclusion: The impugned order was vitiated by an error of law and was liable to be quashed; the writ petitions succeeded in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute makes resale mandatory on the purchaser's default in depositing the prescribed earnest amount immediately, the authority has no discretion to uphold the sale without ordering a re-sale.