Baggage imports in commercial quantities and concealed packages sustained confiscation and penalties for smuggling involvement.

Goods imported in baggage in commercial quantities, outside the free-duty allowance for bona fide baggage and without declaration, were treated as prohibited goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Concealment in suitcases, handbags and packages reinforced the finding of smuggling, and the concealment articles were also liable to confiscation once the goods themselves were confiscable. The findings identifying one appellant as the mastermind and the other as a conduit remained unrebutted, with no material to establish innocence or dislodge the smuggling attribution. The confiscation and penalty orders were therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the seized goods imported in baggage were liable to absolute confiscation and whether the penalties imposed on the appellants called for interference.

Analysis: The seized goods were found to have been imported in commercial quantities in baggage and were not covered by the permissible free-duty allowance for bonafide baggage. The goods were also not declared as required, and the record showed concealment in suitcases, handbags and packages. In such circumstances, the goods were treated as prohibited goods and liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Once the goods were held liable to confiscation, the packages and concealment articles were also liable to confiscation. The adjudicating findings identifying one appellant as the mastermind and the other as a conduit remained unrebutted, and there was no material to establish innocence or to dislodge the finding of smuggling involvement.

Conclusion: The confiscation and penalty findings were upheld and no interference was warranted against the appellants.

Final Conclusion: The appeals failed on merits, and the orders of confiscation and penalty were sustained.

---