<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 799 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245351</link>
    <description>Goods imported in baggage in commercial quantities, outside the free-duty allowance for bona fide baggage and without declaration, were treated as prohibited goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Concealment in suitcases, handbags and packages reinforced the finding of smuggling, and the concealment articles were also liable to confiscation once the goods themselves were confiscable. The findings identifying one appellant as the mastermind and the other as a conduit remained unrebutted, with no material to establish innocence or dislodge the smuggling attribution. The confiscation and penalty orders were therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:23:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 799 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245351</link>
      <description>Goods imported in baggage in commercial quantities, outside the free-duty allowance for bona fide baggage and without declaration, were treated as prohibited goods liable to confiscation under the Customs Act. Concealment in suitcases, handbags and packages reinforced the finding of smuggling, and the concealment articles were also liable to confiscation once the goods themselves were confiscable. The findings identifying one appellant as the mastermind and the other as a conduit remained unrebutted, with no material to establish innocence or dislodge the smuggling attribution. The confiscation and penalty orders were therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>