Dismissal of Delay Condonation Application due to Failure to File Separate Appeals

The Tribunal dismissed the application for Condonation of Delay in filing the appeal and the stay application. The appellant's belief that the main appellant's appeal was sufficient to challenge the impugned order was not accepted as a valid reason for the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the requirement for separate appeals by each party and found the reason for delay unsatisfactory based on past cases, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and stay application.

---

---

Issues: Application for stay, Condonation of Delay in filing the appeal

Application for Stay:
The appellant filed an appeal along with an application for stay and Condonation of Delay in filing the appeal. The reason cited for the delay was the belief that the main appellant's appeal was sufficient to challenge the impugned order, hence no separate appeal was filed. The learned A.R. opposed this, stating that each party must file appeals separately. The Tribunal referred to past cases and found the reason for delay unsatisfactory, leading to the dismissal of the application for Condonation of Delay and consequently the appeal and stay application.

Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appellant, believing the main appellant's appeal was enough, failed to file a separate appeal in time. The learned A.R. argued that appeals must be filed separately, as per the impugned order. Citing precedents, the A.R. contended that the reason for delay was not sustainable. The Tribunal, considering the submissions, noted similarities with past cases where delay was not condoned. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application for Condonation of Delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and stay application.

---

---