TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Bangalore rejects Revenue's application to rectify mistake in Final Order</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE Versus MYSORE TOYS COMPANY</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore rejected the Revenue's application to rectify a mistake in Final Order No. 1181/2009, stating that rectifying the ... Rectification of mistake - Mistake in the finding of the Tribunal that the appellant using the brand name only from 17-2-2001 - Held that:- There is a clear finding in the order-in-original that the appellant is affixing brand name only from 17-2-2001 - The order was pronounced and dictated in the Court in the presence of the departmental representative and the advocate. Since the observations were made based on the submissions made by both the sides and taking note of the submissions and we find that mistake sought to be rectified goes into root of the matter and if attempted to be rectified, such an effort would result in review of the order - Rectification denied. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore rejected the application for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 1181/2009, dated 8-10-2009 filed by the Revenue. The Tribunal found that the mistake sought to be rectified goes into the root of the matter and any attempt to rectify it would result in a review of the order. The application was rejected as having no merit.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
