Rectification limited to apparent record errors; absence of a patent mistake means no review-like correction is permitted.

Rectification of an order dismissing a restoration application was refused because the Tribunal's jurisdiction was limited to correcting a mistake apparent on the record, not reviewing the earlier decision. The order had been dictated in court in the presence of counsel, and no apparent error on the face of the record was identified. As no rectifiable mistake was shown, the application for rectification was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the application for rectification could be allowed on the basis of an alleged error apparent on the record in the order dismissing the restoration application.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the impugned order had been dictated in court in the presence of counsel and that the only power available was to rectify a mistake apparent on the record. It further noted that it had no power of review. As no error apparent on the face of the record was pointed out in the earlier order, no ground for rectification was made out.

Conclusion: The application was rejected.

---