Service tax timing dispute: prima facie view favoured abatement, leading to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

At the stay stage, the taxability dispute centred on whether service tax liability should follow the date of service or the date of receipt of consideration under Notification No. 9/2004-S.T. The appellant argued that abatement should apply to consideration received later for services rendered during the earlier abatement period, and the record did not conclusively displace that prima facie position. The authority found the balance of convenience in the appellant's favour and noted that compliance with the amended non-availment of Cenvat credit condition required final verification. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were therefore granted pending final adjudication.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay during pendency of the appeal on a prima facie view that abatement under Notification No. 9/2004-S.T. applied to consideration received after 1-4-2006 for services rendered before that date.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether service tax liability had to be determined with reference to the date of provision of service or the date of receipt of consideration. The appellant claimed that abatement should follow the service period, and that receipts pertaining to services rendered during the earlier abatement period could not be taxed merely because they were received later. The order noted that the balance of convenience appeared to lie with the appellant and that the record did not conclusively displace the appellant's stand at the stay stage. It was also observed that the impact of the amended condition regarding non-availment of Cenvat credit for the relevant period required verification at the final hearing.

Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery were granted on a prima facie basis in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed to proceed without pre-deposit, and enforcement of the demand was stayed pending final adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: At the stay stage, where the dispute on taxability depends on whether the relevant event is the provision of service or receipt of consideration, and the appellant shows a prima facie case with balance of convenience in its favour, waiver of pre-deposit and stay may be granted.

---