Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The dispute related to CENVAT credit on input services used in a project set-up period. The Tribunal noted that substantial portions of the credit were questioned because the challans and invoices were not addressed to the relevant plant and because some supporting duty-paying documents were not produced before the adjudicating authority. In view of these deficiencies, the Tribunal found that the appellant had not established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of predeposit.
Conclusion: Complete waiver was declined. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 1 crore, and on such deposit the balance predeposit and recovery were stayed pending disposal of the appeal.