Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2014 (1) TMI 424 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellate Tribunal Grants Waiver of Penalty for Impex Ferro Tech Ltd. and Director The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA granted waiver of predeposit of penalty for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Appellate Tribunal Grants Waiver of Penalty for Impex Ferro Tech Ltd. and Director

                              The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA granted waiver of predeposit of penalty for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal accepted the offer to deposit Rs.2,50,000 in addition to the already paid Rs.1,00,000, directing the Company to comply within eight weeks to stay recovery of balance dues. Similarly, waiver of penalty under Section 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for Mr. Virendra Kumar Jain, Director of the Company, was granted on the condition of complying with the deposit requirement to avoid dismissal of the appeal and stay recovery of remaining dues.




                              Issues:
                              1. Waiver of predeposit of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd.
                              2. Waiver of penalty under Section 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for Mr. Virendra Kumar Jain, Director of the Applicant Company.

                              Issue 1: Waiver of predeposit of penalty for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944:

                              The Appellate Tribunal considered the application for waiver of predeposit of penalty amounting to Rs.5,18,436 imposed on M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. The penalty was related to shortages of finished goods discovered during an inspection. The Authorized Representative of the Applicant Company explained that the shortages were acknowledged, and the duty amount for the shortages was already paid. An offer was made to deposit an additional amount of Rs.2,50,000. The Department's representative confirmed the payment of duty but mentioned that the shortage was explained by an employee of the Company, which was further confirmed by the Company's Director. The Tribunal noted that the entire duty amount had been paid by M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. during the investigation and accepted the offer to deposit Rs.2,50,000 in addition to the Rs.1,00,000 already paid. The Tribunal directed the Company to deposit the said amount within eight weeks and stay the recovery of the balance dues during the appeal's pendency. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the appeal.

                              Issue 2: Waiver of penalty for Mr. Virendra Kumar Jain under Section 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002:

                              The Tribunal also addressed the waiver of penalty under Section 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, amounting to Rs.5,18,436 imposed on Mr. Virendra Kumar Jain, Director of the Applicant Company. The penalty was connected to the same shortages of finished goods. The Tribunal's decision regarding the waiver of penalty for Mr. Jain was aligned with the decision made for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. Since the Company had already paid the duty amount and an offer to deposit an additional sum was accepted, the Tribunal directed Mr. Jain to comply with the deposit requirement within the specified timeframe to avoid dismissal of the appeal and stay the recovery of the remaining dues during the appeal process.

                              This detailed judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA involved issues related to the waiver of predeposit of penalties under the Central Excise Act and Rules for M/s Impex Ferro Tech. Ltd. and its Director, Mr. Virendra Kumar Jain. The Tribunal carefully considered the explanations provided, the payments made, and the offers for additional deposits before issuing directives for compliance and stay of recovery during the appeal process.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found