Revenue appeal dismissed for lack of dated authorization from Commissioner, rendering it not maintainable. Appeal and C.O. dismissed. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to an undated authorization from one Commissioner, rendering the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue appeal dismissed for lack of dated authorization from Commissioner, rendering it not maintainable. Appeal and C.O. dismissed.
The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to an undated authorization from one Commissioner, rendering the appeal not maintainable. Subsequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the C.O. stands dismissed as well.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to an undated authorization from one Commissioner, making the appeal not maintainable. The appeal was dismissed, and the C.O. stands dismissed as well.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.