Dispute over Cenvat credit for Telephone, Courier, and Insurance Services resolved in favor of appellant.

The case involved a dispute regarding the availability of Cenvat credit for Telephone Services, Courier Services, and Insurance Services. The appellant argued for the eligibility of these services as cenvatable input services, supported by a detailed chart and precedent decisions. The presiding judge, Ms. Archana Wadhwa, found the issues already addressed in previous decisions and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Availability of Cenvat credit for Telephone Services, Courier Services, and Insurance Services.

Paragraph 1: The judgment concerns the dispute over the availability of Cenvat credit for Telephone Services, Courier Services, and Insurance Services.

Paragraph 2: The lower authorities had denied the credit, stating that these services were not eligible as cenvatable input services.

Paragraph 3: The advocate for the appellant, Shri Hemant Bajaj, presented a detailed chart and cited precedent decisions of the Tribunal supporting the eligibility of these services as cenvatable services.

Paragraph 4: The detailed chart provided by the advocate included specific amounts and purposes for each service, along with references to relevant judgments supporting the eligibility of these services for Cenvat credit.

Paragraph 5: The presiding judge, Ms. Archana Wadhwa, noted that the issues were already covered by the previous decisions referenced in the chart. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was granted the consequential relief.

---