TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on service tax paid for marine inland transit insurance of plant and machinery, insurance of money in transit, follow-up services for installation of the captive power plant, and insurance of personnel working in the factory. (ii) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on telephone services installed at the residence of the General Manager and in the company guest house.
Issue (i): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on service tax paid for marine inland transit insurance of plant and machinery, insurance of money in transit, follow-up services for installation of the captive power plant, and insurance of personnel working in the factory.
Analysis: The definition of input service was applied broadly to cover services connected with business activity and with setting up of plant and machinery. Inward transportation of capital goods was treated as including insurance during transit of machinery from the supplier's premises to the factory. Insurance of money in transit between the factory and the bank was treated as a business-related service. Follow-up services connected with installation of the captive power plant were regarded as business auxiliary services falling within the scope of input service. Insurance of personnel working in the factory, including contract workers covered by the principal employer's statutory responsibility, was also treated as service used in relation to manufacture and business.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible on these services and the disallowance was not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on telephone services installed at the residence of the General Manager and in the company guest house.
Analysis: The services were not shown to have a sufficient nexus with the manufacturing business or with manufacture of the final product. Their use could not be said to be exclusively or substantially in relation to business activity within the meaning of input service.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was not admissible on these telephone services and the denial was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The order was set aside to the extent it denied credit on the specified transit, installation-related and personnel insurance services, while the denial of credit on residential and guest-house telephone services was sustained, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Services having a direct business nexus, including transit insurance of capital goods, money-in-transit insurance, installation-related services, and employee-related insurance, fall within input service, but services lacking a demonstrable nexus with the manufacturing business do not.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
