Tribunal grants cenvat credit on service tax paid for business activities. Address in insurance policy not a bar.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was eligible for cenvat credit on service tax paid by insurance providers for policies related to the appellant's business activities. The denial of credit based on a second address in the insurance policy was deemed incorrect as the address was part of the same entity. The Tribunal directed the appellant to reverse a refund claimed from insurance companies and pay interest, but allowed cenvat credit of Rs. 2,31,918/- without imposing any penalty.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Denial of cenvat credit on service tax paid by insurance providers for various policies.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the denial of cenvat credit of Rs. 2,60,599/- on service tax paid by insurance providers for policies taken by the appellant. The lower authorities contested the availment of credit, citing that the address in the insurance policy included another address not directly related to the manufacturing activity of the appellant. However, the appellant argued that the insurance policies covered plant and machinery, cash in transit, and other business-related aspects. The Tribunal referred to previous cases where cenvat credit on insurance services was deemed eligible for business activities.

The Tribunal found that the insurance policies covered activities related to the appellant's business, making them eligible for cenvat credit. Even though a second address was mentioned in the policy, it was clarified that the address was an open plot allotted to the appellant for future construction, making it part of the same entity. The Tribunal noted that the denial of cenvat credit based on the second address was not in line with the law.

The appellant had claimed a refund of Rs. 28,681/- from the insurance companies, which the Tribunal acknowledged. The appellant agreed to reverse this amount, and the Tribunal directed them to do so within 30 days, along with paying interest. However, for the remaining amount of Rs. 2,31,918/-, the Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for cenvat credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without imposing any penalty on the appellant.

---