https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239081 The case involved a dispute regarding the availability of Cenvat credit for Telephone Services, Courier Services, and Insurance Services. The appellant argued for the eligibility of these services as cenvatable input services, supported by a detailed chart and precedent decisions. The presiding judge, Ms. Archana Wadhwa, found the issues already addressed in previous decisions and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief. en-us Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239081 The case involved a dispute regarding the availability of Cenvat credit for Telephone Services, Courier Services, and Insurance Services. The appellant argued for the eligibility of these services as cenvatable input services, supported by a detailed chart and precedent decisions. The presiding judge, Ms. Archana Wadhwa, found the issues already addressed in previous decisions and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239081