Recall, restoration and rectification applications are not maintainable against a final order disposing appeals on merits.

Applications seeking recall of a final order, restoration of the appeals, and rectification were held not maintainable because the appeals had already been finally disposed of on merits. As the final order was not a dismissal for default, no restoration could be granted. No apparent mistake of fact or law was shown to justify rectification. The combined request was treated as an attempt to reopen a merits-based final disposal, which could not be entertained, and the applications were dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applications seeking recall of the final order, restoration of the appeals, and rectification of alleged errors in the final order were maintainable.

Analysis: The appeals had already been finally disposed of on merits. The final order was not an order of dismissal for default, and therefore no restoration could be granted. No apparent mistake of fact or law was pointed out to justify rectification. The applications were in substance a blend of restoration and rectification requests, neither of which could be entertained against a final order disposing the appeals on merits.

Conclusion: The applications were not maintainable and were dismissed.

---