Rule 57H transitional credit requires identifiable inputs and duty documents; credit was denied for unmatched stock and prior receipts.

Transitional credit under Rule 57H was allowable only for inputs received immediately before the declaration and capable of verification from duty-paying documents. Credit on stock claimed to be lying on the declaration date was denied because the records described the goods generically and did not establish that the stock matched the invoiced alloy bars. The further claim of Rs. 33,197 was also denied because the inputs were not shown to have been received immediately before filing the declaration. The appeal was therefore rejected and the credit disallowance sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether transitional credit under Rule 57H was admissible for inputs claimed to be lying in stock on the date of declaration and supported by duty-paying documents; (ii) whether the amount of Rs. 33,197/- was rightly denied as relating to inputs not received immediately before the filing of the declaration.

Issue (i): Whether transitional credit under Rule 57H was admissible for inputs claimed to be lying in stock on the date of declaration and supported by duty-paying documents.

Analysis: Rule 57H permits credit only in respect of inputs received immediately before the filing of the declaration and requires that the credit be verifiable from duty-paying documents. The claimed stock was found to be described generically in the records, while the invoices reflected different specifications of alloy bars. The records did not establish that the goods in stock were the same as those covered by the invoices, and the basic requirement of verification was therefore not satisfied.

Conclusion: The credit was not admissible and the finding against the assessee was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the amount of Rs. 33,197/- was rightly denied as relating to inputs not received immediately before the filing of the declaration.

Analysis: Credit under Rule 57H is confined to inputs received immediately before the declaration. The disputed amount related to inputs which did not fall within that category, and therefore did not qualify for transitional credit.

Conclusion: The denial of credit for Rs. 33,197/- was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed in full, and the order rejecting the credit claim was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Transitional credit under Rule 57H is allowable only for inputs received immediately before the declaration and only when the inputs are identifiable and verifiable from duty-paying documents.

---