Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic bottles and plastic jars manufactured out of plastic granules could be treated as packaging material under the relevant notification so as to justify the penalty under Section 4B(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act.
Analysis: The notification protected raw materials and goods used in the manufacture or packing of notified goods, including packing material. The decisive question was whether the manufactured articles were in fact intended and used as packing material. On the facts noted, the assessee had itself described the goods in the prescribed forms as plastic goods, and there was no cogent material before the Tribunal to hold that they were packaging materials. The Tribunal's view was found unsupported by recorded reasons and contrary to the findings of the assessing authority and the first appellate authority.
Conclusion: Plastic bottles and plastic jars, when sold as goods in themselves for consumer use and not as packing containers for notified goods, do not fall within the description of packaging material; the Tribunal's order was not sustainable and was set aside.