Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The goods were stated to have been entered in the RG-1 register and later used in manufacture of other goods cleared on payment of duty. The dispute also involved technical questions of classification and whether there was any deliberate intention to evade duty. In these circumstances, the seizure and proposed consequences could not be treated as conclusively established at the interim stage.
Conclusion: The appellant made out a prima facie case, and the requirement of pre-deposit of the entire dues was waived with stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.