2013 (6) TMI 491 - AT - Service Tax

Appellant directed to deposit Rs. 15 lakhs within 12 weeks for tax issue; waiver upon compliance

The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a token amount of Rs. 15 lakhs within twelve weeks due to the complex nature of the issue regarding the ... Nature of receipt - wither in the nature of collection of the maintenance and service charges from the plot holder or of lease rental - Held that:- the issue involved in this case is contentious one and needs to be gone into detail as the findings recorded by the adjudicating authority indicate that the services rendered by the appellant and the amount charged annually, prima facie, may not be covered under the head 'lease rent'. At the same time, we find that the appellant is a Government of Gujarat undertaking as per Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962 and hence, prima facie, can also be considered as a public authority as envisaged by the Board in circular dt.18.12.2006. - prima facie case is not in favor of assessee - directed to make predeposit a token amount of Rs. 15 lakhs. Issues:Taxability of services rendered by the appellant under the category of management, maintenance, or repair services for immovable property.Analysis:The Stay Petition was filed seeking the waiver of pre-deposit of a substantial amount along with interest and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The penalties were imposed by the adjudicating authority based on the appellant's provision of management, maintenance, or repair services by collecting charges from plot holders for maintaining an industrial area. The appellant argued that the amount collected was part of the lease rent and not subject to Service Tax, emphasizing its status as a Government of Gujarat undertaking responsible for industrial development. Reference was made to a similar case involving Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and a circular from the Board. The appellant contended that the services provided were akin to municipal functions for which charges were collected as taxes or fees.The Additional Commissioner argued that the appellant did provide management, maintenance, or repair services to the lessees, supporting the partial deposit order. After considering the arguments, the Tribunal acknowledged the contentious nature of the issue regarding the taxability of services provided by the appellant. While the adjudicating authority's findings suggested that the services rendered and charges may not fall under 'lease rent,' the Tribunal noted the appellant's status as a Government undertaking under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act, 1962, possibly qualifying as a public authority as per a relevant Board circular. Due to the complexity of the issue and the need to delve into the legal submissions further, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a token amount of Rs. 15 lakhs within twelve weeks, considering the appellant's status as a corporation under the Act.Upon compliance with the deposit, the Tribunal allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining amounts, staying the recovery until the appeal's disposal. The decision balanced the need for deposit against the appellant's status and the contentious nature of the issue, providing a pathway for further examination and resolution of the taxability matter.