Imported Apple Trader Granted Provisional Clearance Amid Allegations of Duty Evasion

The court granted provisional clearance of imported apples for a fruit trader due to delays in assessment and release at Chennai Seaport. Allegations of undervaluation and customs duty evasion were refuted by the petitioner, who argued for acceptance of the contract price unless proven otherwise. The court directed release of the goods upon payment of 30% of the differential duty and a personal bond, considering the perishable nature of the goods. Cooperation in the duty assessment process was mandated, with final orders subject to post-adjudication actions if duty evasion was confirmed. The writ petition was allowed with no costs imposed, closing the matter.

---

---

Issues:
1. Delay in assessment and release of imported goods
2. Allegations of undervaluation and evasion of customs duty
3. Provisional clearance under Customs Act, 1962
4. Perishable nature of goods and release conditions

Delay in assessment and release of imported goods:
The petitioner, a fruit trader, imported apples from the United States for several years. The goods arrived at Chennai Seaport but faced delays in assessment and release. The petitioner sought provisional assessment under the Customs Act, 1962, due to the perishable nature of the goods. Allegations of undervaluation and evasion of customs duty were raised by the respondents, causing further delays.

Allegations of undervaluation and evasion of customs duty:
The respondents alleged serious irregularities, citing under-declaration of value by the petitioner, leading to differential duty liabilities. The Consulate General of India highlighted suspected misdeclarations and undervaluation in the import process. The respondents detained the goods pending investigation based on these allegations.

Provisional clearance under Customs Act, 1962:
The petitioner argued that the contract price between the foreign supplier and importer should be accepted unless proven otherwise. The petitioner had paid a significant sum as differential duty pending adjudication. The court noted previous orders granting provisional release of goods in similar cases and directed the respondents to release the goods upon payment of 30% of the differential duty and furnishing a personal bond.

Perishable nature of goods and release conditions:
Considering the perishable nature of the goods, the court ordered the release of the goods upon fulfillment of specified conditions. The petitioner was required to cooperate in the customs duty assessment process. The court emphasized that final orders could be passed post-adjudication, and appropriate actions could be taken if duty evasion was confirmed. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed, with the connected matter being closed.

---