Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (6) TMI 429 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds IT Appeals Commissioner's order, dismisses Revenue's appeal, deletes additions, and upholds Section 147 proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection. The additions of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal upholds IT Appeals Commissioner's order, dismisses Revenue's appeal, deletes additions, and upholds Section 147 proceedings.

                          The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection. The additions of Rs. 26,00,000/- and Rs. 2,60,000/- were deleted as the transactions were deemed genuine with supporting evidence. The initiation of proceedings under Section 147 was also upheld. The decision was pronounced on 7th June 2013.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 26,00,000/- deemed as income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 2,60,000/- as commission for obtaining entries and whitening undisclosed income.
                          3. Genuineness of the receipt of Rs. 26,00,000/- as sale proceeds of shares.
                          4. Validity of the initiation of proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 26,00,000/- Deemed as Income under Section 68:
                          The Revenue contested the deletion of Rs. 26,00,000/- added as unexplained income under Section 68. The Assessing Officer (AO) had received information that the companies from which the assessee received the amount were involved in providing accommodation entries. The AO added the amount to the total income, treating it as unexplained, due to the failure of the assessee to produce bank statements and representatives of the concerned companies. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] found that the transactions were reflected in the audited accounts, and the amounts were received through cheques. The CIT (A) concluded that the assessee provided sufficient evidence, including sale bills, bank statements, and confirmations from the concerned parties, proving the genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s findings, noting that the AO's suspicion was not supported by concrete evidence.

                          2. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 2,60,000/- as Commission:
                          The AO had added Rs. 2,60,000/- on account of alleged commission paid for obtaining accommodation entries. This addition was based on the presumption that the assessee must have paid a commission at the rate of 1% for the entries. The CIT (A) deleted this addition, stating that it was based on pure presumptions without any cogent material or evidence. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT (A), noting that since the main addition of Rs. 26,00,000/- was deleted, there was no basis for the commission addition.

                          3. Genuineness of the Receipt of Rs. 26,00,000/- as Sale Proceeds of Shares:
                          The AO doubted the genuineness of the receipt of Rs. 26,00,000/- as sale proceeds of shares, labeling the transactions as bogus. The assessee argued that the transactions were genuine and supported by documentary evidence, including sale bills, bank statements, and confirmations from the purchasing companies. The CIT (A) examined the evidence and found no suspicious features in the transactions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s findings, noting that the AO failed to provide concrete evidence to disprove the genuineness of the transactions.

                          4. Validity of the Initiation of Proceedings under Section 147:
                          The assessee filed a cross-objection challenging the initiation of proceedings under Section 147. The CIT (A) had upheld the AO's action for initiating proceedings under Section 147. During the arguments, the assessee's representative conceded that the cross-objection was only to support the impugned order and did not make further submissions. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT (A)'s findings and dismissed the cross-objection.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s order deleting the additions of Rs. 26,00,000/- and Rs. 2,60,000/-, finding that the transactions were genuine and supported by sufficient evidence. The Tribunal also upheld the validity of the initiation of proceedings under Section 147. The order was pronounced in open court on 7th June 2013.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found