CESTAT Mumbai Rejects Delay Condonation: Lack of Specific Reasons Leads to Dismissal The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the department's Condonation of Delay application for failing to provide specific reasons for the delay in ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Mumbai Rejects Delay Condonation: Lack of Specific Reasons Leads to Dismissal
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the department's Condonation of Delay application for failing to provide specific reasons for the delay in filing the Cross-objection. The application lacked details on the period of delay and gave a vague explanation of "heavy pressure of work," leading to its rejection by the Tribunal.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Condonation of Delay application filed by the department for not providing specific reasons for the delay in filing the Cross-objection. The application lacked details on the period of delay and gave a vague explanation of "heavy pressure of work." The Tribunal was not satisfied with the explanation and hence rejected the application.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.