Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the basis that it maintained separate accounts and availed the benefit of two exemption notifications simultaneously.
Analysis: The applicant had maintained separate accounts for inputs used in the manufacture of goods cleared under the two notifications. The Board's Circular dated 28-7-2004 clarified that where such separate accounts are maintained, the manufacturer can avail the benefit of both notifications simultaneously. The record therefore disclosed a strong prima facie case in favour of the applicant.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.