Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether objections raised against attachment and proposed sale of property in tax recovery proceedings had to be investigated by the Tax Recovery Officer under the statutory procedure.
Analysis: Rule 11 of Schedule II to the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides a specific mechanism for investigation of claims and objections to attachment or sale of property in execution of a certificate. Since that remedy was available, it was neither necessary nor proper to pronounce on the factual or legal disputes raised by the parties at that stage.
Conclusion: The Tax Recovery Officer was directed to investigate and adjudicate upon the petitioner's objections in accordance with law, and the further action against the property was made dependent on the result of that inquiry.